Post-verbal agreement and obligatory presence of particle to in Polish dual copula clauses
dc.contributor.author | Jurczyk, Rafał | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2025-01-16T13:35:03Z | |
dc.date.available | 2025-01-16T13:35:03Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2024 | |
dc.description.abstract | This paper addresses the obligatory particle to in Polish dual copula clauses (DCCs) with post-verbal agreement and two 3rd person nominative expressions with φ-feature(s) mismatch. It argues that to must be present because the syntax cannot successfully establish the φ-Agree relation between T and the post-verbal nominative expression (NPNOM2). Two crucial premises are adopted. One is Zeiljstra’s (2012) Upward Agree which requires i-features to c-command u-features and, hence, necessitates the closest NPNOM to T to SpecTP-move. The other is Vangsnes’s (2002) obligatory TP identification by the Tense- (provided by T) and φ-features (provided by NPNOM controlling agreement) to anchor the subject to the eventuality denoted by the complex predicate Pred’ [be NPNOM2] (Jurczyk 2021). The examination shows that T-NPNOM2 φ-Agree in DCCs under consideration cannot be established as SpecTP-movement of NPNOM2 is illegitimate; NPNOM2 if formally and syntactically part of Pred’ and is also farther from T than NPNOM1, the pre-verbal nominal expression. Consequently, T’s φ-features remain unvalued, which makes TP formally unidentified. However, since some of T’s NPNOM2-specified features are specified as those on NPNOM1, T attracts NPNOM1 to value them whereas features bearing NPNOM2’s specification get valued as default and lexicalised as the least-marked form in terms of feature specification (following Szucsich 2007), i.e., to[i-neut]. It is thus concluded that the obligatory presence of to is a means of formally identifying TP in case any of T’s NPNOM2-specified φ-features cannot be successfully valued by the T-NPNOM2 Agree relation. | |
dc.identifier.citation | "LingBaW. Linguistics Beyond and Within", 2024, Vol. 10, pp. 65-88. | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.31743/lingbaw.18009 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 2450-5188 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12153/8173 | |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.publisher | Wydawnictwo KUL | |
dc.rights | Attribution 4.0 International | en |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | |
dc.subject | Polish dual copula clauses | |
dc.subject | post-verbal agreement | |
dc.subject | TP identification | |
dc.subject | pronominal clitic to | |
dc.title | Post-verbal agreement and obligatory presence of particle to in Polish dual copula clauses | |
dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
- Name:
- Jurczyk_Post-verbal_agreement_and_obligatory_presence_of_particle_to_in_Polish_dual_copula_clauses.pdf
- Size:
- 371.77 KB
- Format:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
- Description:
License bundle
1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
- Name:
- license.txt
- Size:
- 2.81 KB
- Format:
- Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
- Description: